Yes the same code the controls position switching controls depth chart and override position.

Not too get too deep in the weeds on tangential details but one of the others leagues where I have a team is going to include Punters as eligible to be Kick Holders (instead of just QB's being the only position group that can serve as Kick Holder). This makes sense as this still occurs in real football.

Agree 100% with the innovative idea By Offensive Taco as to the issue of an early season open window for position changes. Doing so would allow for a weight increase from FB to TE to help alleviate the shortage of viable players at this key position. Limits can still be set in our rules to disallow specific unrealistic position changes like CB to DE.

I may allow FB and TE to be used interchangeably. I haven't found much of a functional difference between 243# and 257# against LBs.

As for special teams, until JDB fixes the depth chart issue with them, I'll likely just allow any position to play gunner, blocker, or rusher.

We've seen a team win a championship by spamming TE throws to a converted WR who landed around 240 ...

Also, might as well greenlight FBs playing TE since Denver is flagrantly breaking this rule with an 81 speed FB at TE1 (and no TEs on the roster).

Well if Denver want to do that, can't then complain when people exploit the engine against them.

TO clarify; DE below min weight. If it's a convert from LB, then fair enough, but you don't activate them to game day roster whilst underweight

Over in the "League Forums" in the "Games Engine Focus Discussion", there is a solid conversation developing about the need to maintain the option of players switching positions because of the ongoing paucity of adequate new players available at the various positions in the draft.

The comments by warrior462 are important to consider for future planning for this great league.

It was noted previously that once we are using a fully operational New UI, that we can move a DT or DE to the LB position but cannot move a LB to the DT or DE position (see below from a previous post).

DT <> DE > LB
LB > S > CB
SS <> FS > CB
CB

Our only Ai managed team, the Detroit Lions, just selected a WLB, David Lee, at pick 2.26 of the current draft. On the full listing of available positions on David Lee's player card, WLB is the position at which he has the seventh most potential: (1) LDE 29/78, (2) RDE 29/77, (3) MLB 30/75, (4) DT 29/72, (5) SLB 33/69, (6) SS 24/67, and (7) WLB 32/66.

So, my question is as follows... if we were using the New UI right now, would this player be unable to be switched to LDE, RDE, or DT, even though he has greater potential at those positions?

I planned on opening a switching grace period after the draft, but putting position swaps back in place by preseason.

Perfect. That should work great. Appreciated.