New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: 2005 Draft Discussion

By raidergreg69
7/10/2018 1:16 pm
I hate drafting a K so early but it was a perfect storm of factors.

* Sebastian Janikowski retired on me at the end of last season, leaving me no K

* Free agency didn't offer much K help and I don't particularly like the guy I signed

* Draft Class had just 1 K I wanted

* I couldn't decide on a non K to take a chance on at this point of the draft

Re: 2005 Draft Discussion

By raidergreg69
7/10/2018 4:16 pm
https://nfl.myfootballnow.com/player/5044

I was looking at players for my queue when I ran across this guy with high volatility. Maybe I'm just being stupid but he has Bust in his name so I'm not drafting him.

Re: 2005 Draft Discussion

By Mcarovil
7/10/2018 4:45 pm
That’s classic. At this point 90+ vol is the way to go.
raidergreg69 wrote:
https://nfl.myfootballnow.com/player/5044

I was looking at players for my queue when I ran across this guy with high volatility. Maybe I'm just being stupid but he has Bust in his name so I'm not drafting him.

Re: 2005 Draft Discussion

By Ritzi
7/11/2018 2:56 am
Just added Bustillos, just because of his name :-). Hes quite low on my board so i dont think i get him in the 5th, but if he falls to the sixt...

Re: 2005 Draft Discussion

By Smirt211
7/16/2018 6:58 am
So, you limit what's available at the top of the draft talent wise + volatility skewing to higher for most players and then a 22 vol. player loses -6 in the future and what I believe was a /100 run blocking vital becomes a permanent fixture at 83. Yeah, ok. LOL

Oh, can't wait for lovely version 4.3.....



Last edited at 7/16/2018 6:59 am

Re: 2005 Draft Discussion

By Mcarovil
7/16/2018 7:09 am
Yeah. No rhyme or reason. When all else fails I look to see what attributes can not go down and go with that.