Re: 2005 Draft Discussion
by
raidergreg69
@
7/10/2018 1:16 pm
I hate drafting a K so early but it was a perfect storm of factors.
* Sebastian Janikowski retired on me at the end of last season, leaving me no K * Free agency didn't offer much K help and I don't particularly like the guy I signed * Draft Class had just 1 K I wanted * I couldn't decide on a non K to take a chance on at this point of the draft |
|
Re: 2005 Draft Discussion
by
raidergreg69
@
7/10/2018 4:16 pm
https://nfl.myfootballnow.com/player/5044
I was looking at players for my queue when I ran across this guy with high volatility. Maybe I'm just being stupid but he has Bust in his name so I'm not drafting him. |
|
Re: 2005 Draft Discussion
by
Mcarovil
@
7/10/2018 4:45 pm
That’s classic. At this point 90+ vol is the way to go.
raidergreg69 wrote: https://nfl.myfootballnow.com/player/5044 I was looking at players for my queue when I ran across this guy with high volatility. Maybe I'm just being stupid but he has Bust in his name so I'm not drafting him. |
|
|
|
|
Re: 2005 Draft Discussion
by
Ritzi
@
7/11/2018 2:56 am
Just added Bustillos, just because of his name :-). Hes quite low on my board so i dont think i get him in the 5th, but if he falls to the sixt...
|
|
Re: 2005 Draft Discussion
by
Smirt211
@
7/16/2018 6:58 am
So, you limit what's available at the top of the draft talent wise + volatility skewing to higher for most players and then a 22 vol. player loses -6 in the future and what I believe was a /100 run blocking vital becomes a permanent fixture at 83. Yeah, ok. LOL
Oh, can't wait for lovely version 4.3.....
Last edited 7/16/2018 11:59 am
|
|
Re: 2005 Draft Discussion
by
Mcarovil
@
7/16/2018 7:09 am
Yeah. No rhyme or reason. When all else fails I look to see what attributes can not go down and go with that.
|
|