Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
I will never criticize any trade offer or any trade made between any parties but looking at this season trades it makes me think is there double standard to look at the trades as most people who are vocal of my trades are pulling some bold trades ( if I were to evaluate from same lenses than it can be called questionable trades ).
Anyways I have changed my ways to align but it does make one pause and think is there different standard apply to different owners ?
Again I don’t want any trade reversed or nor there is any need for trade committee but could not hold back an observation.
I know it will ruffle some feathers but it’s honest view for what it’s worth
If only the game had a passive-aggressive attribute for owners...
If you see an issue with any trades, simple answer is say so and explain your rationale. Maybe your point is valid, maybe not.
People are free to give their views on trades.
Victim card firmly declined.
At your request I have put my points on trades
Re: It makes you think…
by
martinwarnett
@
9/12/2025 2:01 am
Which is fine, and is the way to do it.
Re: It makes you think…
by
setherick
@
9/12/2025 9:00 pm
I brought up the idea of a trade committee in the past and no one seemed that interested.
I'm too busy to police trades that don't drastically change the talent calculus of a team, which usually means top first round picks.
There have been a lot of bad trades, but nothing to the point of egregiously trading away top 10 picks year after year for veterans at the end of their career. Even Martin trade of the SS as bad as it was will likely not set back Tennessee. The problem with that trade is the SS only has one position and can't flex to CB to finish his career.
I take on board your view, Seth; I was switching him between SS and CB, using him at CB as younger players not panning out.
As you're better at player evaluation than I am, I'm happy to accept your view of the trade and have offered a compensatory trade to Tennessee.
Re: It makes you think…
by
hkpman7180
@
9/14/2025 11:26 pm
setherick wrote:
I brought up the idea of a trade committee in the past and no one seemed that interested.
I'm too busy to police trades that don't drastically change the talent calculus of a team, which usually means top first round picks.
There have been a lot of bad trades, but nothing to the point of egregiously trading away top 10 picks year after year for veterans at the end of their career. Even Martin trade of the SS as bad as it was will likely not set back Tennessee. The problem with that trade is the SS only has one position and can't flex to CB to finish his career.
One missed out fact most of my so called borderline trades has associated correction trade too……
Anyway my goal was never to reverse so will move on knowing it’s ok to have borderline trades has as long as it’s 2nd rd picks
