Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
Return to old website
People who liked this post

Vote on one of the following new flex rule ideas:

Allow neither.
7
Allow RBs to flex to FB in the 221 to get a chance at the play making potential.
2
Allow both.
2
Allow WRs to flex to TE2 in the 122 and 221 to take advantage of the big play potential.
1
martinwarnett
Re: Flex Rule Suggestion Poll
by martinwarnett @ 6/22/2025 10:07 am
Neither for me.

RB at FB is slightly more palatable, but a WR at TE? i know the game engine is flawed, but it smacks too much of exploiting, playing the engine rather than the opponent.

End of the day, just one view out of 32, but can't see me wanting to do either.
setherick
Re: Flex Rule Suggestion Poll
by setherick @ 6/22/2025 1:21 pm
The RB to FB flex is similar to why I allow it with the split backs.
kalvin1991
Re: Flex Rule Suggestion Poll
by kalvin1991 @ 6/23/2025 12:03 am
I agree also, but I rarely hear a wr playing te in a flex but a te in a wr position is much more in common.