Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
I've no idea. Just thinking might be worth tightening the rules up against known exploits - imo if you put a CB in STRusher spots either in depth chart or overrides, you're doing it to try to exploit, so the intent is more important to me.
This glitch is solved. No greater effect as long as the P has Punt Timing >75.
Good to hear, as I said though, the *intent* to exploit is more important.
Re: Roster Rules
by
Vikings_Fan
@
2/02/2025 11:20 pm
Question about the Roster Rules on position default weight vs. position minimum weight.
RB default weight is 217#, minimum weight to play the position is 210# per the Roster Rules.
TE default weight is 257#, minimum weight to play the position is 245# per the Roster Rules.
What about FB? Default weight is 243#. Minimum weight to play the position is _____?
(Example... I have an aging RB that I converted to FB. He has topped out at 238#. Once the regular season starts, is it permissible to use this player at FB? It would seem this would be permissible because of the RB / FB flexibility noted in rule #3 under Flex Rules but I wanted to ask to make sure.)
Last edited 2/03/2025 5:52 am
Re: Roster Rules
by
setherick
@
2/08/2025 4:28 pm
Vikings_Fan wrote:
Question about the Roster Rules on position default weight vs. position minimum weight.
RB default weight is 217#, minimum weight to play the position is 210# per the Roster Rules.
TE default weight is 257#, minimum weight to play the position is 245# per the Roster Rules.
What about FB? Default weight is 243#. Minimum weight to play the position is _____?
(Example... I have an aging RB that I converted to FB. He has topped out at 238#. Once the regular season starts, is it permissible to use this player at FB? It would seem this would be permissible because of the RB / FB flexibility noted in rule #3 under Flex Rules but I wanted to ask to make sure.)
I never clarified that you can put a RB in the FB spot of the 203 split backs. This seemed obvious because you could already flex a WR there by the rules, but I wanted to make it clear.
