This glitch is solved. No greater effect as long as the P has Punt Timing >75.

Good to hear, as I said though, the *intent* to exploit is more important.

Question about the Roster Rules on position default weight vs. position minimum weight.

RB default weight is 217#, minimum weight to play the position is 210# per the Roster Rules.

TE default weight is 257#, minimum weight to play the position is 245# per the Roster Rules.

What about FB? Default weight is 243#. Minimum weight to play the position is _____?

(Example... I have an aging RB that I converted to FB. He has topped out at 238#. Once the regular season starts, is it permissible to use this player at FB? It would seem this would be permissible because of the RB / FB flexibility noted in rule #3 under Flex Rules but I wanted to ask to make sure.)

I'm good with 235 so you can convert WRs.

Just took over the Colts, and want to check if I need to change something ASAP, or is it legit?

My FB2&3 are also TE2&3.

IMO, the weights are similar enough, but I couldn't find anything about swapping between those positions.

I haven't been playing close attention to the TE2&3 as long as they are played by FB/TE

Posted here by mistake, Im getting more senile.

I never clarified that you can put a RB in the FB spot of the 203 split backs. This seemed obvious because you could already flex a WR there by the rules, but I wanted to make it clear.