New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Community Help Forum

Re: Improvement

By Rumplebeanskin
1/27/2016 8:15 am
Great info, thank you for that. I'll use it in my draft philosophy accordingly.

Finally, just drafted a mid 30's overall QB, high 70's future. What is most likely the best strategy for him? Bench for a few years? Or just throw him to the wolves straight away? :)

Pretty sure I read players improve the most when playing?

Re: Improvement

By lellow2011
1/27/2016 8:17 am
Rumplebeanskin wrote:
Great info, thank you for that. I'll use it in my draft philosophy accordingly.

Finally, just drafted a mid 30's overall QB, high 70's future. What is most likely the best strategy for him? Bench for a few years? Or just throw him to the wolves straight away? :)

Pretty sure I read players improve the most when playing?


I'd make sure he plays a lot in the preseason and then just play your guy with the best current rating during the regular season.

Re: Improvement

By setherick - League Admin
1/27/2016 9:10 am
Rumplebeanskin wrote:
And on the back of that, I wondered what sort of potential changes occur, in terms of range. 5 points? 10? 50?! :)

Thank you!


I've seen a number of players go +10 on potential in MFN-19, including three on my own team. And there was a post in the main forums about a player going +20 in the main forums. The guy that I'm curious about is this one: http://mfn19.myfootballnow.com/player/3980

He's already +12 potential at the start of his second year. Note his draft position.

Re: Improvement

By Kboum
1/27/2016 9:22 am
My FS is
From Start: +39/+25

He's now 81 future so he was 56 when he got drafted.

Re: Improvement

By setherick - League Admin
1/27/2016 1:09 pm
Kboum wrote:
My FS is
From Start: +39/+25

He's now 81 future so he was 56 when he got drafted.


This is the player I was thinking about when I referenced a thread about a player improving 20+ potential above. Thanks for posting it again.