New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Community Help Forum

Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By Wolfkill
3/15/2020 2:03 pm
What is more useful? Which is better? Is there a difference?
Any opinions?

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By raidergreg69
3/15/2020 2:12 pm
I only look at bump and run for DB's but M2M for both. I would think LB aren't usually in position to bump and run against a RB or TE with a running start.

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By Wolfkill
3/15/2020 2:53 pm
raidergreg69 wrote:
I only look at bump and run for DB's but M2M for both. I would think LB aren't usually in position to bump and run against a RB or TE with a running start.


Understood, yet they show both as major attributes for a defensive coach.
Kind'a conflicting.

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By setherick - League Admin
3/16/2020 7:54 pm
B&R is essential if you are going to flex your WLB to a WR when you stay in base against the 113 or 203.

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By CrazySexyBeast
3/28/2020 8:58 pm
MLB needs both z/m2m. OLB need higher br/c, m2m vs zone.
Then again, is one running more m2m (much more viable in 4.5 as zone STILL has issues *hoping 4.6) over zone in the LB D? Right now, MLB needs both in equality (+70) and OLBs need more m2m/br/c.
There are position weights/clues available for 4.5 within the forum search.
:)